I’ve been waiting on the sidelines of the digital photography revolution for years now. Mainly because I haven’t been willing to replace my analog SLR (Nikon F80) with a point a shoot digital camera. Not for lack of output quality; some of these smaller cameras give very pleasant results. One of things that I love is the TTL (through the lens) viewfinder that you can only find in a SLR camera. So I haven’t bought one yet since DSLRs are costly and though this may sound contradictory to what I just said about the TTL experience, DSLRs had till now one major flaw over all other digital cameras - they don’t do live LCD preview of the shot. While I would spend maybe 80% of shooting time through the viewfinder, there are shots that are better taken with the LCD. This is changing these days. Both Canon and Olympus are releasing new DSLRs with live LCDs. I’m not sure how the Canon system works but the Olympus one is clever:
The seven-point-five megapixel E-330 is the first digital SLR designed to provide a full-time live view on its LCD monitor while still providing a usable through-the-lens viewfinder. It provides two live view modes, the first uses a small CCD sensor integrated into the viewfinder chamber, the second mode uses the main sensor but this blocks the viewfinder and disables auto-focus.
I’m guessing that all the other manufacturers will follow shortly (I only really care about Nikon), and that this technology will permeate down to the more affordable DSLRs like all other advanced features. Now I have a good reason to wait another couple of years for my DSLR. Should I get a point and click digital in the meantime? I have also been eying these hybrid video/photo digitals that look like they have progressed from the “jack of all trades, master of non” stage.
Technorati Tags: photography, DSLR